This is a talk page to discuss the improvement of Category:Candidates for deletion. This talk page is currently active, with unresolved topics.
To discuss this article's topic and ask questions, see the Discussions Area.Please remember to remain civil during all disputes.
Sign any comments you make on this page with four tildes (
~~~~
).Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion.
Contents
- 1 Category Tony Stark's Inventions
- 2 Other Products
- 3 The Avengers: Battle for Earth
- 4 Agent Maria Hill's Field Office
- 5 Category Aliens
- 6 Category Children
- 7 Phase 4
- 8 Playground Vaults
- 9 EMS Isolation Bafflihg
- 10 Culver University Staff
- 11 Cal
- 12 Harrison and Amanda Carter
- 13 Union Jack disambiguation page
- 14 Zebediah Killgrave
- 15 List of Inhumans
- 16 Draw Your MCU Whirlwind
- 17 New Avengers
- 18 Picture Deletion
- 19 Bundespolizei & Police
- 20 Zola HYDRA Symbol
- 21 Ancient One's Fans
- 22 Untitled Avengers 4 Movie
- 23 Iron Man (film) action figures
- 24 List of Deaths in MCU Movies
- 25 Roberto da Costa
- 26 Nick Fury (Projection)
- 27 Muhammad Ali
- 28 The Daily Bugle
- 29 Runaways: An Original Novel
- 30 Guardians of the Galaxy: EcoSport Adventure
- 31 Unidentified Earth-like planet and Vrellnex
- 32 The Avengers Leitmotif
- 33 Tumblr Profile/Time Variance Authority
- 34 Georges Batroc's Mercenary Group
- 35 Jack Frost
- 36 Avengers Campus
- 37 T'Challa Star-Lord
- 38 Runaways (film)
- 39 The Zombies
- 40 LGBTQ+ Characters
- 41 Black and Gold Suit
- 42 Balthakk and Ikkon
- 43 Earth-616
- 44 Future Projects
- 45 Thor Ragnarok
- 46 Illuminati Assembled
- 47 Galactic Frontier
- 48 Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings
- 49 Joe Biden
- 50 Noor
- 51 Mr. Immortal
- 52 Septimus Bloodstone
- 53 Bart Mueller, Kurt Swanson & Marlene Stewart
- 54 User:Jab10.6/Thor/Team Thor
- 55 Group that used the Power Stone
- 56 Abigail Brand
- 57 Talokanil Armed Forces
- 58 Counter-Earth and Halfworld are the same planet?
- 59 Marlene Stewart
- 60 Rio Vidal
- 61 Laputa Robot
- 62 Category:Bestman Salvage Leaders
- 63 Facebook Profile/The Daily Bugle
Category Tony Stark's Inventions[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- ' {{{sig}}}
Do we really need this category? --UskokHail HYDRA! 07:47, September 15, 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think we do. It seems redundant to have this along with Items and Iron Man Armors.----XxxOUTBURSTxxx (talk) 00:33, September 16, 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Other Products[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Not deleted {{{sig}}}
The page "Other" is a redundant orphan. It has no links, and the all of the info is available on the Marvel Cinematic Universe page.Turtletrekker (talk) 23:56, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
The Avengers: Battle for Earth[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Already deleted {{{sig}}}
The page for The Avengers: Battle for Earth does not belong in a site about the Marvel Cinematic Universe because, due to the additional characters, un-referenced plotline, different uniforms, and deliberately stated status as not relating to the MCU, it wouldn't go here in a place that has at least debatable information. This game is listed on the Marvel Wiki. In fact, the very status of the game as listed as "Marvel Avengers" instead of "Marvel's The Avengers", the title of the film, shows it is not something that belongs here.
Aside from that, the fact that it is listed on pages as a video game appearance of certain objects and characters is very inaccurate, given this status. Even the tie in material for other video games and comics adheres to some information regarding the films, and this game does not. GZilla311 (talk) 21:39, January 30, 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Agent Maria Hill's Field Office[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Not deleted, but renamed {{{sig}}}
Why is Maria Hills Field Office being deleted?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.20.5.192 (message wall • contribs)
The articles has been renamed (losing the "Agent"), and the previous name, that was only a redirect now, has been marked for deletion. The full article is located under the name: Maria Hill's Field Office Shabook (talk) 01:57, February 18, 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Category Aliens[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Already deleted, duplicated article {{{sig}}}
Since the humans are also aliens to all other races of the MCU, I think this category isn't needed. After all, this wiki should be "planetary neutral", therefore the categories shouldn't be named from the humanity's point of view.--UskokHail HYDRA! 13:18, April 13, 2014 (UTC)
- So that rather than a generic "aliens" category, separate categories for 'Asgardians", "Jotuns", "Kree", ect? Sure. That would be more accurate anyway. Turtletrekker (talk) 19:10, April 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Exactly!--UskokHail HYDRA! 06:18, April 16, 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Category Children[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Already deleted {{{sig}}}
Do we really need this category?--UskokHail HYDRA! 14:01, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think so..., besides, most of the children are already classified as students.Shabook (talk) 14:03, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
Well, some kids are not old enough to be in school I bet... I just thought it would be a helpful category... ~Silverstream (talk) 14:05, November 21, 2014 (UTC)Silverstream
- I think it is a helpful category. Besides, you guys are adding a lot of new categories at the moment, and I think that this one makes more sense that some of the others I have seen. Dr.Who1997HAIL HYDRA! (◣‿◢) 14:13, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
- What we have added is a lot of consistent and previously discussed and agreed categories...Shabook (talk) 14:15, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
Ok, fine. Feel free to reverse my edits then.~Silverstream (talk) 14:19, November 21, 2014 (UTC)Silverstream
- If we keep this category, we would have to make the "Grown ups" category, and I think we don't need that.--UskokHail HYDRA! 16:34, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
- Do we? Because it's kind of logic that everyone who isn't a child is a grown up...Dr.Who1997HAIL HYDRA! (◣‿◢) 16:43, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
We have a category for students, it wasn't necessary to make one for graduates. ~Silverstream (talk) 17:02, November 21, 2014 (UTC)Silverstream
- Because all those "graduates" became Executives, Lawyers, Musicians,Physicians, Politicians, Professors, Journalists, Scientists... Categories have to created with some consistency, and the Students, with all those categories, belong to a group of categories named "Characters by Occupation". There was a discussion to decide how to stop some wild categories that were being created just to be deleted, and it was agreed that categories have to meet some requirements beyond simple "usefulness", and this one doesn't meet them.Shabook (talk) 21:34, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Phase 4[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Already deleted, duplicated article {{{sig}}}
Phase 4 page should be here because it tells it's future films of the Marvel cinematic universe.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.62.145.200 (message wall • contribs)
Agreed. There's already an article called Phase Four. You made yours second and without sources. The original is better, more fitting to this wiki's format. However, unsourced material and endless lists WILL NOT BE TOLERATED! If you want, you can create an account and begin a blog documenting what movies you desire in Phase 4.Bratpack (talk) 03:41, November 30, 2014 (UTC)
Candidates for deletion pages should be worked out on or deleted.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.62.144.129 (message wall • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Playground Vaults[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Already deleted {{{sig}}}
I understand the reason as written but I have a question: Will they have their own subsection in the Playground article? The events (especially D) here are too important for a simple summary of "Vault D is a prison" or "Vault B is for file storage."...Bratpack (talk) 18:48, December 5, 2014 (UTC)
- I'm starting to write the locations articles for Season 2 right now, and the Playground will obviously be the most detailed one, just like the articles about Los Angeles and New York City. The events that happened inside both vaults will be treated with the same degree of detail that the ones that happened inside Coulson's office, Fitz's lab or the Hangar, inside their own subsections of the main "History" section. It will also have a "Layout" section explaining the different rooms, just like Tony Stark's Mansion.Shabook (talk) 18:53, December 5, 2014 (UTC)
- If I understand correctly, the Playground article would look something like this.--UskokHail HYDRA! 20:09, December 5, 2014 (UTC)
- More or less; basically, it will look like Tony Stark's Mansion. Shabook (talk) 20:12, December 5, 2014 (UTC)
- If I understand correctly, the Playground article would look something like this.--UskokHail HYDRA! 20:09, December 5, 2014 (UTC)
Can I still work on that article though it has that template, in case either are used in the next episode?...Bratpack (talk) 20:42, December 5, 2014 (UTC)
EMS Isolation Bafflihg[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted {{{sig}}}
I feel the need to protest the deletion of this article. Many events have occurred in this room, from Skye's first interrogation on the Bus, to keeping Hannah Hutchins safe, to containing Ian Quinn. This room holds enough significance to deserve it's own article, in my opinion.~Silverstream (talk) 17:09, December 20, 2014 (UTC)Silverstream
- I agree with Silversteam. The Cage is a heavily featured part of the Bus, where a significant amount of events have happened. And the reason Shabook gave isn't enough in my opinion. Sure, you could say that about a minor room, but not about the Cage. There is enough information to make a whole article out of it, so I think it should still be one.Dr.Who1997HAIL HYDRA! (◣‿◢) 17:15, December 20, 2014 (UTC)
- It's not about "this room", it's about rooms, plural. If we start creating articles for each individual room inside each individual facility or location, we would have dozens of small articles. Only the bus has the cargo ramp, the laboratory, the "living room", the mission briefing room, the cockpit, the bunks, the cage, and Coulson's office. Now imagine having all those articles, and for every other facility, from the Playground, Stark's Mansion, the Triskelion... What must be done is to tell each of these events in the History section of the Bus, instead of randomly creating articles... I'm afraid that once the Bus History section is updated, this article will be deleted, and all rooms will be explained in the Layout section of the Vehicle / Facility, just likt the article about the Hub. Shabook (talk) 17:18, December 20, 2014 (UTC)
- In other words, wait until you see the final product. It will be satisfactory (comprehensive and inclusive) when the Bus page is updated. The category is a label until then; if something happens there, I will still edit it until the rewrite is complete. Bratpack (talk) 17:41, December 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Also, EMS Isolation Bafflihg is not the correct name for the room. That is the name for the shielding of the room as shown in Repairs and in the map. The name of the room is either Interrogation room if you want to go by the Blueprints or the Cage if you want to go by the show.
- http://marvelcinematicuniverse.wikia.com/wiki/File:Bus_Blueprints.jpg
- Coluanprime (talk) 18:48, December 20, 2014 (UTC)
Culver University Staff[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Already deleted {{{sig}}}
I don't see why we can't have these pages. These characters all exist in the Marvel Cinematic Universe and have been named, and we have pages for characters that have not been seen or named e.g. Ward's parents and sister, Peggy's husband. Greater Good (talk) 05:34, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Character biographies must be written from the point of view of the actual character, and therefore, talk about remarkable facts in their biography. Explaining what other people were doing when they mentioned a character is NOT a remarkable fact in anyone biography. That's the reason we have a List of Minor Characters, and the reason Melinda May's phone contacts were deleted when they were created. The same applies to these "Somebody else's family member" articles. Shabook (talk) 06:37, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with Shabook. Somebody might decide to make pages for every name on the Project Insight list, using that logic...73.39.158.171 12:17, December 29, 2014 (UTC)Bratpack (talk) 12:53, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Indeed, and we wouldnt want that to happen. The Family pages I am fine with, if written correctly, but not all those staff members.TomasDerksen (talk) 13:05, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with Shabook. Somebody might decide to make pages for every name on the Project Insight list, using that logic...73.39.158.171 12:17, December 29, 2014 (UTC)Bratpack (talk) 12:53, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Both the Manual of Style and the Layout Guide have been improved to avoid precisely those kind of things. It is strongly advised to all regular editors to read them. Shabook (talk) 13:08, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Cal[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Already deleted, Following Redirect Policy {{{sig}}}
Since that is his only name in-show, it should, at the very least, be maintained as a redirect. Coluanprime (talk) 20:48, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
Harrison and Amanda Carter[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Already deleted {{{sig}}}
Let's wait until Agent Carter ends its season to see if we can construct a worthy article for this... Shabook (talk) 14:17, January 12, 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Union Jack disambiguation page[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Not deleted {{{sig}}}
Considering that the page doesn't lead to James Montgomery Faisworth, but to a disambiguation page, the existance of the page doesn't imply that this is his alias in MCU. Besides, it is explicitely stated that the alias is in use in the mainstream Marvel Universe. Meanwhile, Peggy Carter has indeed been called "Miss Union Jack", albeit in a easter egg-esque fashion.
It is conceivable that someone may be looking for Union Jack on the wiki, thinking of either Falsworth (the original Union Jack) or Carter (someone who has been indeed been called that in the context of MCU). The page directs to either pages and informs the reader about the two Union Jack-related references within MCU's context; ergo, the use of the disambiguation page has both navigative and encyclopedic value.Hshai (talk) 19:08, February 6, 2015 (UTC)
- The page will stay, it follows our policies, just like Graviton, Leader, Quake, Mister Hyde... Shabook (talk) 20:11, February 6, 2015 (UTC)
- Just because it follows the redirect policies doesn't mean the page is needed, so that isn't a proper argument for it to stay. Within the MCU there is only one person associated with the name Union Jack, and thats "Miss Union Jack" Peggy Carter. Within the MCU Faisworth has no Union jack related reference. So, within the MCU there is only one Union jack-Related reference. But if most people think it belong here I will just follow their wishes.TomasDerksen (talk) 13:45, February 7, 2015 (UTC)
- Now you changed it, the argument makes sence, it indeed is like redirects from names not used with in the MCU. And I can agree with that argument now.TomasDerksen (talk) 23:46, February 6, 2015 (UTC)
- I think the page should stay.--UskokHail HYDRA! 10:11, February 7, 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Zebediah Killgrave[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Version deleted, re-created as Kilgrave {{{sig}}}
Why is the Zebediah Killgrave page up for deleation? It's confirmed that David Tennant will xplay the role, we know the character's history in the comics? what's the issue?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerdtastic1221 (message wall • contribs)
- The Conjecture Policy? Information from the comics is not information from the MCU. Shabook (talk) 21:32, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
- comic history isn't MCU history—Preceding unsigned comment added by TomasDerksen (message wall • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
List of Inhumans[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Already deleted {{{sig}}}
- As the Inhumans world is expanding vastly, I think there should be a list of all of them in the wiki. So a question to the admin, should it really be deleted?
Draw Your MCU Whirlwind[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Already deleted {{{sig}}}
What's the problem. I come in peace. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.51.109.114 (message wall • contribs)
- Sorry but that page would fit in a blog post not that kind of page.AKA S.I.H (talk) 01:58, May 28, 2015 (UTC)
- This wiki covers content officially released by Marvel Studios in its pages. If you wish to create fan contests, perhaps you should try another wiki about fanon content--Shabook (talk) 07:24, May 28, 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
New Avengers[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Article won't be created for the new roster at the end of Avengers: Age of Ultron {{{sig}}}
Can some of the admins please unlock this article so we could edit it?--Blaublau94 (talk) 06:56, April 25, 2015 (UTC)
- You have this article to edit. It was said before, we won't make new articles for different incarnations of S.H.I.E.L.D., HYDRA, etc. And that includes the Avengers too.--UskokHail HYDRA! 07:04, April 25, 2015 (UTC)
- But this is a case by case scenario... the examples you gave:
- S.H.I.E.L.D. - We have the same organization but working in the shadows as we saw at the beginning of season two, same name, same members, same ideology.
- HYDRA - Just like above, HYDRA never really have died, it survived inside S.H.I.E.L.D. as an secret organization inside another secret organization (like Garrett said), again same name, same members, same ideology.
- But this is a case by case scenario... the examples you gave:
- I completely agree with you on these 2 but this one is different:
- Avengers x New Avengers - Different Members: most of the founding members are not on this new group (Stark, Thor, Hawkeye and Hulk) and the New Avengers only have 2 of the founding ones with the addition on new ones (War Machine, Falcon, Vision, Scarlet Witch). Different Name: Not only we have in the comics a different group called New Avengers that coexist with the Avengers, but it was explicit on the movie that this is a new group when the new base appeared with the text New Avengers Base, North of New York City (I have to watch the movie again to be sure of its location). And a New Ideology: The New Avengers have a training camp just like the Avengers Academy where they train enhenced people (I have to find the article where I saw that).
- I guess in this case the New Avengers are to the Avengers what HYDRA were to the Nazist Party, behaving as a new branch but acting independently. I know it's a little confusing but I hope you guys can understand me hahaha--Blaublau94 (talk) 07:38, April 25, 2015 (UTC)
- First, the comics (Earth-616) are completely irrelevant here. The only sources we use are the MCU sources. Second, though most of the original Avengers have left the team, two of the original members are still in the team, which makes it the same team. Two members of the original HYDRA led the new HYDRA too (Zola and Whitehall), which makes it the same organization. Third, it's Avengers: Infinity War, not New Avengers: Infinity War.--UskokHail HYDRA! 07:46, April 25, 2015 (UTC)
- "most of the original Avengers have left the team, two of the original members are still in the team, which makes it the same team." That doesn't make any sense but anyway... Of course I know that Uskok, I cited 616 just as a basis for the new page. Using your point of view we should delete STRIKE (within SHIELD), Schutzstaffel and Wehrmacht (within the Nazy Party) and many others, you are a bit confused on your arguments.--Blaublau94 (talk) 08:17, April 25, 2015 (UTC)
- First, the comics (Earth-616) are completely irrelevant here. The only sources we use are the MCU sources. Second, though most of the original Avengers have left the team, two of the original members are still in the team, which makes it the same team. Two members of the original HYDRA led the new HYDRA too (Zola and Whitehall), which makes it the same organization. Third, it's Avengers: Infinity War, not New Avengers: Infinity War.--UskokHail HYDRA! 07:46, April 25, 2015 (UTC)
- I guess in this case the New Avengers are to the Avengers what HYDRA were to the Nazist Party, behaving as a new branch but acting independently. I know it's a little confusing but I hope you guys can understand me hahaha--Blaublau94 (talk) 07:38, April 25, 2015 (UTC)
- I am not confused at all. The SS was a military wing of the Nazi Party, the Wehrmacht was not. You're using wrong examples.--UskokHail HYDRA! 08:23, April 25, 2015 (UTC)
- STRIKE was a team within S.H.I.E.L.D., not a different incarnation of the organization, therefore, it deserves its own page. With all these examples Uskok is providing (S.H.I.E.L.D., HYDRA, and now the Avengers) the organization is the same, and it has simply evolved. Therefore, if any example is wrong is the one about STRIKE. I agree with Uskok, this "New Avengers" page is not going to be created for the events of Age of Ultron. Shabook (talk) 10:15, April 25, 2015 (UTC)
One more thing, if the label is the only proof for these "New Avengers", the "New Avengers Base" label doesn't mean "Base of the New Avengers", it means "New base of the Avengers". Shabook (talk) 13:24, April 25, 2015 (UTC)
Just to chip in, the Avengers have a revolving roster. What would you call the third, fourth, fifth incarnations of the team? --Alientraveller (talk) 13:37, April 25, 2015 (UTC)
Alright, do what you think is the best for the wiki, I hope you'll get to a better conclusion later...--Blaublau94 (talk) 17:39, April 25, 2015 (UTC)
See it as a football team. When a part of a football team leaves, and another part stays, with some new aditions. Is it then an entire new football team? Lets say: Real Madrid sales 20 players, but only keeps Ronaldo and Modric, then they buy 20 new people. Is Real Madrid then a new group? No it i still Real Madrid.TomasDerksen (talk) 18:28, April 25, 2015 (UTC)
- Thomas this is different... what if you change the team's players, name, manager, and location?--Blaublau94 (talk) 01:04, April 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Name isn't changed though. It only says there is a New Avengers base. The Stark Tower is the old, this is the new. Changing the name, players, manager and location of a football team doesnt mean its a new football team. I know a few football clubs who changed names, still same clubs.TomasDerksen (talk) 01:09, April 26, 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Picture Deletion[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted {{{sig}}}
There's a picture of me in a Character infobox on my Profile page that is said to be deleted because it is non-MCU related. Which is true. Should I replace it with a picture MCU-related that's not of me?
Bundespolizei & Police[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted {{{sig}}}
They are major players in the upcoming film; why would we delete this page? We have ones for other organizations that are mentioned only in passing, like the DGSE. I was going to create pages for the LAPD and Metropolitan DC police as well; they're major organizations. Why would we delete them? They're part of the universe. KennyChief (talk) 21:09, November 28, 2015 (UTC)
- If we have a page for the Congolese Army we certainly should have one for an organization as prominent as the Bundespolizei. KennyChief (talk) 21:13, November 28, 2015 (UTC)
- Don't you just hate it when someone refers you to a talk page and then doesn't talk to you? It makes my blood boil. Marking the Bundespolizei page for deletion is an insult to this wiki's standards. But nevertheless, i was told to come to this talk page and explain why it should not be deleted. There was no response, so i removed the candidacy tag. Then it just pops back up without any dialogue and with the poster ignoring his own instructions to go to the talk page? give me a break. What a joke. KennyChief (talk) 22:44, November 28, 2015 (UTC)
- It was explained. "Following Article Creation Policy. If there is enough info when the film is released, create the article then." --UskokS.H.I.E.L.D. Headquarters - Playground 18:43, November 29, 2015 (UTC)
- Don't you just hate it when someone refers you to a talk page and then doesn't talk to you? It makes my blood boil. Marking the Bundespolizei page for deletion is an insult to this wiki's standards. But nevertheless, i was told to come to this talk page and explain why it should not be deleted. There was no response, so i removed the candidacy tag. Then it just pops back up without any dialogue and with the poster ignoring his own instructions to go to the talk page? give me a break. What a joke. KennyChief (talk) 22:44, November 28, 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Zola HYDRA Symbol[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Solved {{{sig}}}
The Zola HYDRA symbol that User Shabook added should not be deleated. If you compare it to the image that User Blaublau94 added the other day, you can see that Shabook's image is clearer and more in focus. Also, it's lighting is darker. If anything, I say that Blaublau94's image comes before Shabook's in sequence order.--Professor Ambrius (talk) 20:11, January 22, 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Ancient One's Fans[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted {{{sig}}}
Hello.
I would like to request deletion of this page: http://marvelcinematicuniverse.wikia.com/wiki/Magic_Fans
The reason is that her fan isn't actually her weapon. Is just an ordinary fan that she wears through the movie. The weapon used in the picture is a type of Light Mandala, regular battle spell that most sorcerers can use. If you look closely, she isn't actually wielding any tangible object, as it is described in the article. --Solipsius (Dreamer) (talk) 16:18, November 29, 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Untitled Avengers 4 Movie[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted {{{sig}}}
I would like to request the not-deletion of this page. Ok I get why u deleted it cuz I put in a fan theory, so can we take that out and still have this up? Zirkleboss (talk) 04:56, October 29, 2017 (UTC)Zirkleboss
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Iron Man (film) action figures[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted {{{sig}}}
Apologies. I ended up creating a duplicate page because the original was improperly labelled as a "Category". I've removed all content and images from the original, which I think should be deleted.
And given that there are already pages dedicated to specific merchandise pieces for each film, I don't see why this would be considered any more unnecessary.KamenrideUSA (talk) 02:27, May 7, 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
List of Deaths in MCU Movies[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deceased Characters category {{{sig}}}
I don't know why this page is being deleted. This is important info, and the agents of shield wiki has one, and it's not like I'm putting in random deaths for no reason. If you want me to put in a spoilers bar, I can do that. If it's for any other reason, please tell me.FriedCats2222gggg (talk) 14:50, February 4, 2019 (UTC)
- Important info? In what way? If someone wants to know who's dead in the MCU all they have to do is look at the Deceased Characters category. As for the Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Wiki, what works on one Wiki doesn't have to work on another one. Different Wikias means different rules, different ways of writing articles, etc.--UskokS.H.I.E.L.D. Headquarters - Playground 19:18, February 4, 2019 (UTC)
Personally, I quite liked the addition, it's made for an interesting visual guide to the deaths of the MCU, maybe not the most necessary addition, but an enjoyable one. It's easy to pick out pages that might not be the most necessary, like the List of Firearms, but I quite like their inclusion. I would support and contribute to the creation of a List of Deaths page.Nerdtastic1221 (talk) 21:23, February 4, 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Roberto da Costa[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted {{{sig}}}
There's an alleged Easter Egg claiming that Roberto da Costa/Sunspot's name is in Endgame, but it's not true. People have verified that his name does not appear on the memorial at all. So I'm thinking that the page needs to be deleted. Jotaro Kenshiro (talk) 00:06, May 17, 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Nick Fury (Projection)[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted {{{sig}}}
I don't understand why the page Nick Fury (Projection) is up for deletion. The page isn't pointless because the projection of Fury is an important character and the fact that it isn't a real person doesn't pose a cause for deletion, because the Framework people, the Elementals and the Fear Dimension Illusions weren't real either, and they all have pages for each individual named or central person from them. I feel Fury's projection, as well as the other projection characters deserve pages of their own and their lack of existence seems odd to me. FriedCats2222gggg (talk) 19:51, August 31, 2019 (UTC)
- The having other pages is never a reason per se. The Framework characters are characters from an alternate universe which manifests in the main one as computer programs, but they are fully-fledged characters. The Fear Dimension illusions, same argument. The Elementals are already an exception, and kept because of their overall plot importance and SEO impovements due to their comic-book origins. The rest of illusions don't deserve articles, especially just created as stubs for the sake of being created.--Shabook (talk) 18:18, September 9, 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Muhammad Ali[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted {{{sig}}}
Muhammad Ali was listed as a candidate for deletion because real world characters who are only mentioned don't get pages. However, much like the Franklin D. Roosevelt page, Ali is not only mentioned but he appears in footage in the Punisher episode listed on its page. Ali appears, isn't just mentioned, and should not be deleted.RazorNovaStrike (talk) 00:42, September 9, 2019 (UTC)
The Daily Bugle[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- ' {{{sig}}}
While I agree that the videos alone are not enough to warrant wiki pages, the news articles altogether have actual information in them as well as the videos were relevant. They directly refer to existing material. It was pointed out to me that The New York Bulletin doesn't have pages for its news articles but they haven't been posted in depth and with video references like The Daily Bugle has.- Yuvi3000 (talk) 11:17, November 1, 2019 (UTC)
- Not sure what this is about, but The Daily Bugle/Promotional Campaign covers the RL website, while The Daily Bugle covers the in-universe organization. No need for more subpages.--Shabook (talk) 02:53, April 9, 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Runaways: An Original Novel[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted, totally unrelated to the MCU despite the falacious defense below {{{sig}}}
I personally don't think this page should be removed. Although it's true that the comic isn't canon to the MCU, it is still based on actual MCU content, Runaways, and therefore should not be deleted. It holds the same legitimacy as any of the video games or other comics on this wiki. If we are going to have a page for Doctor Strange: Episode 0, we should have a page for this book as well.--Rman41 (talk) 02:33, April 9, 2020 (UTC)
- The "we should have this because we have that one" is never an argument. There is a big difference between content set in an apocryphal version of the MCU, and content based just based on a property that has also been adapted to the MCU. The second one, such as this novel, has no place in the MCU wiki.--Shabook (talk) 02:56, April 9, 2020 (UTC)
- I think I was under the misconception that the book itself was based on the TV Series. After doing more research, the only indication of that I can find is the sticker on the front. Seems to just be an implication of advertising mistake on my part; good point overall.--Rman41 (talk) 22:40, April 13, 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Guardians of the Galaxy: EcoSport Adventure[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted {{{sig}}}
This comic is not set in the MCU, nor is it based on MCU content. It uses the MCU Guardians of the Galaxy logo, similar to the Guardians of the Galaxy animated series, but the characters and items are the Earth-616 variants from all evidence I have seen. The comic does feature MCU elements, such as the Milano and Yaka, but they are the pre-established Earth-616 versions it appears. I would say delete it, all of the MCU-related elements are just the existing Marvel Comics adaptations.--Rman41 (talk) 02:42, April 14, 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Unidentified Earth-like planet and Vrellnex[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Speculation {{{sig}}}
I´ve just posted this articles and you want to delete them? What´s wrong with this user? I would never delete a recent made article and you?—Preceding unsigned comment added by IchigoGa14 (message wall • contribs)
- Speculation is not allowed in the articles. Vrellnex has never been mentioned or even referenced. As for the first article, such speculative name has no place in this wiki. Sorry if it is discouraging, so it is that people don't bother in following the guidelines some of us spent hours writting to help others.--Shabook (talk) 19:44, May 11, 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
The Avengers Leitmotif[]
I made this article (and had hope to make similar articles) to show the evolution of the musical score in the Films and Tv.
I would like an explanation as to why my article is up for deletion and if there’s any way we can start detailing the scores of the MCU like this?
I think a lot of people would be interested in this topic and hopefully as people’s add more we can all learn something new. thank you sincerely mcedam —Preceding unsigned comment added by mcedam (message wall • contribs)
- It's probably not allowed or something. I don't know, I haven't read the guidelines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AquaticSans (message wall • contribs)
Tumblr Profile/Time Variance Authority[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted {{{sig}}}
So, some doubt has been raised about how official the [Tumblr Profile/Time Variance Authority] is. Here is a link to the account for reference.
Points in favor of it being official:
- The page links to Disney's official Privacy Policy. It is illegal to do this if it's not official
- The timing is consistent with the page being used as buildup to Loki
Points in favor of it being unofficial:
- The page interacts with this Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. account, which is also highly likely to be a fan account
- The page is not linked to on any official websites, including Marvel and Disney's websites, whereas campaigns such as Explore Madripoor are
- Official accounts don't generally interact and change the way the account is run based on people following. The account stopped posting coded messages a while ago, but when one user commented a coded message today, the account suddenly started posting coded messages again. The message was not like any of the previous ones, it was just another memorandum. While this could be a coincidence, the timing very much suggests that the fan running the account saw the comment and thought "We haven't posted coded messages in a while, let's do that again."
What I propose is moving the page to a user subpage or blog, where it can still be updated with new posts until we know whether it's official, so that if we do move it back to the main space of the Wiki, it will be a full article. Thoughts on this are welcome Brett3801 (talk) 02:26, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with moving it to a user subpage for now. Until we can concretely rule one way or the other whether it is an official account or not, and especially under the impression that it likely is not an official account, we should not host this content on the mainspace. - Blogs • Message Wall • Guestbook 21:34, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Another point to favor the account being fake is the coloration of the TVA logo. I based my logo recreation on it in the assumption that it was real originally, however, my original color scheme from before I discovered the Tumblr account is far more accurate to what has been shown than the one the account uses. The logo in the series is distinctly orange in hue, with that being the case for all related logos and the mascot character, while the Tumblr account uses a light cherry red. - Blogs • Message Wall • Guestbook 20:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Georges Batroc's Mercenary Group[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- It is LAF -> Deleted {{{sig}}}
Why is this article tagged for deletion? We include articles for all teams of characters, and this one has three named members and a mainstream comics counterpart. Is this because it is unnamed? We have given generic names for the likes of Nick Fury's Crew, the Stokes Crime Ring, Jigsaw's Crew. Gonzalo84 (talk) 16:14, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Jack Frost[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- False -> Deleted {{{sig}}}
Jack is the younger sister of Bucky and is set to appear in the next season of TFAWS but already appeared in Captain America: Winter Soldier according to the actress Taylor Larums, IMDB page which has been approved by the website as true. Please let me know of anything else —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fishesandchipers (message wall • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Avengers Campus[]
This “land” in California adventure is clearly based on the MCU because all the MCU actors appear. It may not be cannon, but it should still be covered on this wiki. FoxyAlex25 (talk)
T'Challa Star-Lord[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Star-Lord/Ravager T'Challa {{{sig}}}
Why is is being deleted ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Venom1502jw (message wall • contribs)
- Star-Lord/Ravager T'Challa, that’s why. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AquaticSans (message wall • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Runaways (film)[]
So I admit, before I made the page, I didn't even know that List of Undeveloped Movies was a thing, so if it really is to be merged there then yeah.
That said, I think this film may stand out from the others listed there for a few reasons. The original concern that the film was not officially announced I suppose is technically true(?) It was at least acknowledged by Marvel Studios to exist and directly attributable to them via the casting call, which of course listed them directly; I would argue that may count as an "announcement" in some respect, especially since this was before Marvel Studios held slate announcements at SDCC and such. It's also worth noting that we have a significant amount more information on this film specifically than any of the others listed in undeveloped movies. We have main cast callings for the main protagonists, as well as an entire (admittedly vague) plot synopsis. To my knowledge, none of the other projects listed have anything of that sort. I think this film warrants an article of its own given how much we have that would otherwise go undocumented on the site if it was simply merged into the list. - Blogs • Message Wall • Guestbook 00:03, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
The Zombies[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Name decided, pages created {{{sig}}}
Why do you want to delete the pages about the zombified characters of What If... Zombies!?, it makes no sense, we need to keep them, even if they are not important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SMF206 (message wall • contribs)
- The name has not been discussed yet. -Steve Fuenzalida (talk) 13:09, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
LGBTQ+ Characters[]
I was trying to create a category for all the confirmed LGBTQ+ Characters like Loki and Valkyrie and Phastos and Marcus Benson or Joey Gutierrez from Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. but it kept getting deleted. Why? I know there are not a whole bunch of LGBTQ+ Marvel Characters but there are enough to the point where there should be a category for them. Could y'all please stop deleting before I even finish? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PickledPepperPeter (message wall • contribs)
- The page you created wasn't even a category page it was just a page called "LGBTQ+ Characters", if you were to create one it would be called "Category:LGBTQ+ Characters", but Shabook has protected that page so it's obvious he doesn't want that page on the wiki. If you see the other category pages you would see that they are called "Category:Whatever Category this is" -Ewysgarcoyustcrouiwetsnro - My Blogs - Message Wall - 04:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Black and Gold Suit[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Marvel Cinematic Universe Wiki:Article Creation Policy {{{sig}}}
A user (Ewysgarcoyustcrouiwetsnro) has labelled my article (Black and Gold Suit) for deletion but has not given a reason. I would like to appeal against this and keep my article in the mainstream. —Preceding unsigned comment added by A Homescapes Player (message wall • contribs)
- We don't create separate articles for all the Spider-Man Suits. MJLogan95 (talk) 18:48, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- My article (Black and Gold Suit) has been labelled for deletion because “Spider-Man suits don't have their own page” even though the Iron Spider Armor has it’s own page. I would like to appeal against my article being deleted. A Homescapes Player (talk) 10:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Iron Spider Armor is clearly an exception. We didn't make pages for every single Captain America suit, we didn't make pages for Spider-Man's Stark suit, Homemade suit, etc. MJLogan95 (talk) 17:30, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- My article (Black and Gold Suit) has been labelled for deletion because “Spider-Man suits don't have their own page” even though the Iron Spider Armor has it’s own page. I would like to appeal against my article being deleted. A Homescapes Player (talk) 10:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Stop recreating the page, we said why you should not make it. -Ewysgarcoyustcrouiwetsnro - My Blogs - Message Wall - 23:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Balthakk and Ikkon[]
I've noticed that both of these pages have been marked for deletion because they were "not mentioned." While I'm aware that neither of them were actually mentioned in the films, the "magic coordinator" for Doctor Strange, Jay Funk, confirmed that these were the names of the spells, suggesting that they do exist within the franchise. Maybe "mentioned" isn't the correct term to use for the infobox, but I couldn't think of what else to put there instead. Maybe something like "powers" or "spell"? If they shouldn't have been added at all, I'm perfectly fine with that. I just wanted to clarify my reasons for adding them in the first place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Logo8th (message wall • contribs)
- I guess they can be added, but that is up to the administrators. And you should sign your comments with four tithes ("~") it signs like this. --> -Ewysgarcoyustcrouiwetsnro - My Blogs - Message Wall - 04:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Since making this message, I've noticed that both pages have been deleted because they were "not mentioned." As I said previously, while I'm aware that neither of them were actually mentioned in the films, the "magic coordinator" for Doctor Strange, Jay Funk, confirmed that these were the names of the spells, suggesting that they do exist within the franchise. I changed the small text in the infobox to "(powers)" instead of "(mentioned)", but I left the deletion template intact because I would be perfectly fine if it was decided that they shouldn't have been added at all. Despite this, I just wanted to clarify my reasons again for adding them in the first place and to determine why they were deleted despite potentially existing in some form in the franchise in a similar way to the mystic entities whose power is utilized in relics. Logo8th (talk)
Earth-616[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- We haven't created universe pages in the past, this isn't different {{{sig}}}
Why are you guys deleting Earth-616? THERE IS PROOF ON THE PAGE?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bathor (message wall • contribs)
- It's getting deleted because:
- It is written from an entirely out-of-universe perspective, whereas we write articles from an in-universe perspective
- It is not a page, rather just a list of times the MCU has been called Earth-616
- We don't create pages for universe designations on this Wiki
- The article is not written following our policy
- The article is not formatted following our policy
- It is almost entirely speculative
- The MCU is not Earth-616. It has been officially described as Earth-199999, with a few Easter egg references to Earth-616. Mysterio was blatantly lying when he said the MCU was Earth-616, the blackboard is barely legible compared to the direct confirmation out of universe, and the only maybe acceptable argument is the Loki thing, which again is just an Easter egg reference. Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse refers to Peter B. Parker as being Earth-616, are you suggesting that there are two Peter Parkers who are Spider-Man on Earth-616? And how does that line up with the comics being Earth-616?
- Yelling at people about what you think should be a page is not going to get anything done. The article breaks many of our policies and is factually inaccurate. Do not create it again. This is your warning. -Jessica3801 (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- The fact that the article is written as an argumentative essay alone is grounds for its deletion. - Blogs • Message Wall • Guestbook 19:40, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Future Projects[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Upcoming Content exists {{{sig}}}
User:Burgundy69, why have you added this page for deletion? The is a lot of future projects, without phase announced. Adding them to Phase 4 without sourcee in wrong. Thee must be separate for this projects, before their phase confirmed.Lado85 (talk) 09:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- The page is clearly copy-pasted from Wikipedia. If this page was determined to be necessary by the wiki staff, it would have to be an original page created for the wiki and not stolen from Wikipedia. --Burgundy69 (talk) 09:26, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Thor Ragnarok[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Marvel Cinematic Universe Wiki:Redirect Policy {{{sig}}}
Why is Thor Ragnarok as a redirect to Thor: Ragnarok a candidate for deletion? —Scott (talk) 14:57, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- It is unnecessary. -Ewysgarcoyustcrouiwetsnro - My Blogs - Message Wall - 19:36, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- Why is it unnecessary? Without the redirect, when someone starts typing out the title, they get no suggestions. You have to type the whole thing out and get the results page. With the redirect, you get there much quicker. —Scott (talk) 20:34, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- It mainly doesn't the redirect policy, it says nothing about movie titles without the colon. And if you search Thor Ragnarok and press enter you will find the normal page just fine. And don't upload non-marvel cinematic universe images. -Ewysgarcoyustcrouiwetsnro - My Blogs - Message Wall - 05:42, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Why is it unnecessary? Without the redirect, when someone starts typing out the title, they get no suggestions. You have to type the whole thing out and get the results page. With the redirect, you get there much quicker. —Scott (talk) 20:34, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Illuminati Assembled[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Universe pages have not been implemented yet {{{sig}}}
Why is this going to be deleted? Just because this universe doesn't have a name? Sorry, i don't understand. Can we rename it to Earth-838 or isn't enough? HeitorHenrique1455 (talk) 16:10, July 22, 2022 (UTC)
- This universe doesn't have a name. This placeholder name is used by the wiki to differentiate the articles. If you look at the What If...? universes, they have their own earth code, but they don't get their own pages. We only use earth codes in the List of Alternate Universes page and not in other places. - Raff • Message Wall • Contributions 18:10, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- You're wrong, actually. This is not a placeholder name, it is simply the site-given differentiative. A placeholder would be like what we had before 'Illuminati Assembled' was decided, which was just 'Illuminati'. However, we have not discussed the creation of universe pages from site-given differentiatives yet, although that is surely inevitable, so I have deleted the page for now. We have decided not to use Earth numbers, however, so 'Earth-838' would not be the correct title. - Blogs • Message Wall • Guestbook 18:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Yea, that's pretty much what I was trying to say, I just admittedly used the wrong term in this situation. - Raff • Message Wall • Contributions 18:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- You're wrong, actually. This is not a placeholder name, it is simply the site-given differentiative. A placeholder would be like what we had before 'Illuminati Assembled' was decided, which was just 'Illuminati'. However, we have not discussed the creation of universe pages from site-given differentiatives yet, although that is surely inevitable, so I have deleted the page for now. We have decided not to use Earth numbers, however, so 'Earth-838' would not be the correct title. - Blogs • Message Wall • Guestbook 18:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Galactic Frontier[]
I was just wondering what the concept art that supported the planet Falligar was seen on being Alfheim? Not doubting, just wondering. That and I’m not sure about the whole thing about the Bifrost supposedly only being able to travel between the Nine Realms since in Thor: The Dark World and it’s Prequel comic it was seemingly able to travel to places like Korbin and Ria and was able to reach Indigarr in Love and Thunder. -Psychomagalor1 (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Template mistake, not deleted {{{sig}}}
Does anybody know why Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings is listed as a candidate for deletion? I have not seen anything wrong about it, yet.
NarendraMartosudarmo (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- It's because of the way that Template:Shang-Chi Movies was marked. It has nothing to do with the movie's page. -Jessica3801 (talk) 03:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. Thank you for clarifying.
NarendraMartosudarmo (talk) 03:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Joe Biden[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- No divergent history {{{sig}}}
I disagree with the Deletion. Elijah Palmer (talk)20:20, September 10 2022 (EST)
- He wasn't mentioned in the MCU -Ewysgarcoyustcrouiwetsnro - My Blogs - Message Wall - 05:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Noor[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Not deleted {{{sig}}}
Why the Noor's page was deleted? The One Who Theorizes - (talk) 21:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Mr. Immortal[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Mister Immortal situation handled {{{sig}}}
They just marked this page for deletion because there was already another page about a different version of the character that EVEN GET RELEASED. And worst of all, the "original" page is closed to edits. I disagree with this deletion. -The One Who Theorizes (talk) 18:23, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Septimus Bloodstone[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted {{{sig}}}
This page should be deleted, as Septimus means seventh, or seven, in Latin. -Ewysgarcoyustcrouiwetsnro - My Blogs - Message Wall - 04:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- While Septimus is a legitimate Latin name, the text reads "ULIXES, SEPTIMUS FILIUS", which should mean "Ulysses, the seventh son." If they meant "son of Septimus" then the Latin is in error, as it should have been "ULIXES, SEPTIMI FILIUS".
- Therefore, unless there is further evidence of a Septimus Bloodstone (e.g. a comics character, a cross-reference in another marvel project, mention in an inteview), then I concur with Ewysgarcoyustcrouiwetsnro: we should assume "seventh son" is the meaning here. --Mad Latinist (talk) 00:47, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- This is a pretty cut and dry case, I feel. You are correct. - Blogs • Message Wall • Guestbook 03:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- I was wondering the same thing and I agree with the deletion. LR2159 (talk) 20:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm in full agreement. -Jessica3801 (talk) 15:40, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- I'm in agreement with everyone else. This seems very unanimous.
Mister Explicit • Message Wall • Contribs • Discord - 16:12, 8 December 2022 (UTC)- I also agree that this page should be deleted. To add to the discussion, it should be noted that the idea of a "seventh son" means that in occult folklore, the son will be given special powers that can be used for good or evil. This is probably what they were going for for a character like Ulysses in a special like this. Criszz (talk) 23:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- I'm in agreement with everyone else. This seems very unanimous.
- I'm in full agreement. -Jessica3801 (talk) 15:40, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- I was wondering the same thing and I agree with the deletion. LR2159 (talk) 20:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Bart Mueller, Kurt Swanson & Marlene Stewart[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted {{{sig}}}
They are not working on Deadpool 3 as costume designers as it was recently confirmed that Mayes C. Rubeo is the costume designer for the film. KingArti (talk) 19:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
User:Jab10.6/Thor/Team Thor[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Thor/Team Thor {{{sig}}}
Hello. This is my personal blog post, does this wiki have a policy on those? If not, I would like it to remain in existence. Thanks! --Jab10.6 (talk) 19:39, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Group that used the Power Stone[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Not deleted {{{sig}}}
I can't find a source to that group's name, which this wiki is currently calling "Cosmic Beings." They're not named in the movie. I can't find them in the artbooks. They have no comic counterpart. I feel like the name's made-up. Since the extent of this group's existence is 5 seconds of exposition, which already exists on the Power Stone page, I don't think this page should exist at all. Lightning Laxus (talk) 03:37, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- You're not citing any reason for the article to be deleted. It complies with the Article Creation Policy.--Shabook (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- The name seems to be made-up. Lightning Laxus (talk) 04:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- And that is no reason for the deletion of the article. There is an entire policy governing the instances where articles are not given names and need one.--Shabook (talk) 13:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, if you disagree with deletion, then I propose renaming it at the very least because the current name is unspecific, arbitrary, and it's also a synonym of cosmic entities. (E.g. The Watcher says that Infinity Ultron is on the level of a cosmic being. A reader who searches the term would be directed to these guys.) The naming policy says to use a conjectural name based of dialogue and the only piece of dialogue that refers to them just calls them "a group," so I'm reluctantly suggesting "Power Stone Group." Lightning Laxus (talk) 14:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- And that is no reason for the deletion of the article. There is an entire policy governing the instances where articles are not given names and need one.--Shabook (talk) 13:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- The name seems to be made-up. Lightning Laxus (talk) 04:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- If you want to suggest a rename, do it through the appropriate Talk Page. This page is for deletion proposals, and this one has failed to address an actual reason to delete this page.
- Yeah I agree with Lightning lexus. Because I have never heard of cosmic beings in the MCU. Larry Feinberg (talk) 00:24, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Abigail Brand[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- With the series over, it was shown that she was not Abigail Brant {{{sig}}}
I disagree with the deletion of Abigail Brand. Emilia Clarke playing G'iah does not bar her from playing a human character named Abigail Brand. For example, G'iah, the Skrull, needs a real human to use as a disguise. We already saw this with Talos and R. Keller, who are both played by the same actor. I think it would be better to wait for the series to release before deleting any pages we shouldn't. Criszz (talk) 13:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- If it turns out that she is indeed impersonating a human named Abigail Brand, we can always restore the page. MJLogan95 (talk) 13:21, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- We don't create/keep things just in case they turn out to be true. If there is no confirmation, it doesn't belong in the wiki.--Shabook (talk) 19:00, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with MJLogan and Shabook. The fact that G'iah is impersonating a human who looks like Clarke doesn't mean that it's Abigail Brand, nor that Brand will appear in the show. Even if it is Brand, she might be a mentioned only character and Clarke still can't be said to be playing Brand (see Lilla Mackenzie/Chronicom compared to Lilla Mackenzie and Lilla Mackenzie/History Altered by Chronicoms for an example of this in practice). -Jessica3801 (talk) 20:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Talokanil Armed Forces[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Kept after reformatting {{{sig}}}
The reason why I upload a pictures of the Talokanils is because its been over 4 months since Wakanda Forever came out and y'all didn't do your jobs of uploading anything in this source.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Damauri1688 (message wall • contribs)
- The issue wasn't the pages existence, it was the formatting which went against our Manual of Style. Instead of just creating pages, please make sure you are doing it in accordance with our policies. -Jessica3801 (talk) 17:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Counter-Earth and Halfworld are the same planet?[]
I’m curious where in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3 it is implied or confirmed that Counter Earth is the same planet as Halfworld where Rocket was engineered? Is there a line saying so or do they show Rockets origin and later show the location he was experimented on to br on Counter-Earth? I’m just curious if theres actually evidence suggesting them to be the same place. Also note that in the clip with Lylla and Rocket and the other animals she mentions them being taken to a “new world” which I feel implies they were going to be transferred from Halfworld to Counter-Earth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psychomagalor1 (message wall • contribs)
- You'll find the source for this in Counter-Earth's References, or for your convenience here as per James Gunn's official Twitter itself. Unless I'm mistaken (to which I apologize), "new world" refers to them leaving Arête Laboratories into the wider Counter-Earth, but then again I could be wrong. Mshcollector (talk) 14:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Marlene Stewart[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted {{{sig}}}
Could we delete the Marlene Stewart page since she's not involved in Deadpool 3. KingArti (talk) 00:49 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Rio Vidal[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Deleted until sufficient evidenxe {{{sig}}}
Rio Vidal should be deleted as the main source of information that did provide the character by name has since backtracked and removed any mention of the character from the article. To articulate further, this interview from Mashable with Sasheer Zamta that came out earlier today originally stated the following:
- ...including Patti LuPone as as Lilia Calderu, Joe Locke as Billy Kaplan, and Miles Gutierrez-Riley as Billy’s boyfriend Hulkling. Aubrey Plaza will also appear as Rio Vidal, a new character created specifically for the series.
Those three names are to note as those were all sourced from rumors/leaks about the characters were supposedly playing. However, the article later was edited and changed to say the following:
- ...including Patti LuPone, Joe Locke, Aubrey Plaza, and Miles Gutierrez-Riley.
It is clear that the author of this article used rumors/leaks as sources when writing this specific part, realized their mistake, and then backtracked and edited the article to reflect the change and only give accurate and confirmed information about the cast. Case and point, since the information is considered inaccurate (by both the original author and ourselves as we don't use rumors/leaks as sources), this page should not exist for the time being (even if in the future this does turn out to be true). Pr0tato210
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Laputa Robot[]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
- Kept {{{sig}}}
Why is this a necessary article? What is the significance in the MCU or even the comics? I looked up Laputa Robot online and all I can find is this one cartoon robot that does not seem affiliated with Marvel which makes me ask another question of how do we even know this is that robot? Even if it is, it should not have an article. - Raff • Message Wall • Contributions 02:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Unless someone can find a relevant and reputable source that confirms the fact that's a reference to the Laputa Robot from Castle in the Sky, I see no reason why this should be on the wiki. - DemKnux (Talk • Contributions) 10:52, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Even if a statue of Laputa Robot from Castle in the Sky is indeed in the film, that is still not a reason for it to get its own article. Criszz (talk) 03:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Apparently, a robot like this briefly appeared in AoU. Not very familiar with it and I haven't seen that cartoon, so I don't know if it's a Laputa Robot. It has no relevance to the MCU, and therefore, the article should be deleted. Mvrr Message Wall 7:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, the robot appeared in Age of Ultron. From what we see of it, it has the same design as it did in the cartoon, and it's even credited as the "Laputa Robot" in the actual credits (photo added for reference). I just thought it had the same amount of relevance to the MCU as Eagly from Peacemaker or the Slugs from Slither did. In that those "crossover characters" got their own pages instead of only being regulated to the Trivia section. Juanagarfield 12:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for explaining. - Raff • Message Wall • Contributions 20:28, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, the robot appeared in Age of Ultron. From what we see of it, it has the same design as it did in the cartoon, and it's even credited as the "Laputa Robot" in the actual credits (photo added for reference). I just thought it had the same amount of relevance to the MCU as Eagly from Peacemaker or the Slugs from Slither did. In that those "crossover characters" got their own pages instead of only being regulated to the Trivia section. Juanagarfield 12:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Apparently, a robot like this briefly appeared in AoU. Not very familiar with it and I haven't seen that cartoon, so I don't know if it's a Laputa Robot. It has no relevance to the MCU, and therefore, the article should be deleted. Mvrr Message Wall 7:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Even if a statue of Laputa Robot from Castle in the Sky is indeed in the film, that is still not a reason for it to get its own article. Criszz (talk) 03:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.
Category:Bestman Salvage Leaders[]
Does this really need to be a category? There is only one character who fits it, and it is a small detail about that character to begin with.--Uncleben (talk) 17:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- That's how our categories work. - Raff • Message Wall • Contributions 04:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Facebook Profile/The Daily Bugle[]
This page, Instagram Profile/The Daily Bugle, and Twitter Profile/The Daily Bugle seem largely pointless when The Daily Bugle/Promotional Campaign exists. DemKnux (talk) 13:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)